As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

⌗ Head-to-head · Smart plugs · 2026

TP-Link Tapo P110 vs ANTELA 16A

Prices in euros from Amazon.de, as of 11 June 2026. Prices and availability may differ on Amazon.co.uk.

By Seydhan Cakmak · Editor-in-chief · Last checked: · AI-translated from the German original

Both Wi-Fi plugs measure power consumption, need no hub and work with Alexa and Google Assistant. The differences lie in stated switching capacity, ecosystem and price. We compare measurement, power, app connectivity, Wi-Fi and price.

Editorial rating based on manufacturer specs and Amazon catalogue data. We do not trial products ourselves. How we rate

TP-Link P110 TP-Link

P110

9.0/10 from €10.90
ANTELA 16A Smart Plug ANTELA

16A Smart Plug

7.4/10 from €27.52
⌗ Head-to-head

Who wins in which category?

CategoryWinnerReasoning
Switching capacityTP-Link Tapo P11016 A / 3,680 W stated against only 16 A without a wattage figure for the ANTELA.
Consumption monitoringTP-Link Tapo P110real-time and historical consumption against consumption monitoring on the ANTELA, documented in more detail for the Tapo.
Ecosystem breadthANTELA 16ASmart Life / Tuya connects to a very large cross-manufacturer device family; Tapo stays within the TP-Link universe.
Voice controlTP-Link Tapo P110Alexa and Google Assistant on both, level on this point; the rest of the Tapo's lead decided it.
PriceTP-Link Tapo P110from €10.90 against from €27.52 for the ANTELA.
⌗ Editorial recommendation

Which one is right for you?

If you want an inexpensive, well-documented metering socket with a clear 3680 W rating → TP-Link Tapo P110. If you are already in the Tuya/Smart Life universe and want to bundle everything in one app → ANTELA 16A. The Tapo is clearly cheaper and better documented here, while the ANTELA scores mainly with its ecosystem integration.

⌗ Frequently asked questions

TP-Link Tapo P110 or ANTELA 16A? Short answer.

Which is better: TP-Link Tapo P110 or ANTELA 16A?

It depends on your priority. Switching capacity: TP-Link Tapo P110 (16 A / 3,680 W stated against only 16 A without a wattage figure for the ANTELA); consumption monitoring: TP-Link Tapo P110 (real-time and historical consumption against consumption monitoring on the ANTELA, documented in more detail for the Tapo); ecosystem breadth: ANTELA 16A (Smart Life / Tuya connects to a very large cross-manufacturer device family; Tapo stays within the TP-Link universe). The verdict of this comparison explains which model suits which type of user.

How do the TP-Link P110 and the ANTELA 16A differ?

The TP-Link P110 and ANTELA 16A differ mainly in these points: switching capacity (advantage TP-Link Tapo P110), consumption measurement (advantage TP-Link Tapo P110), ecosystem breadth (advantage ANTELA 16A), voice control (advantage TP-Link Tapo P110), price (advantage TP-Link Tapo P110).

⌗ Keep reading

More smart plug comparisons.