As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Philips STH3020 vs Russell Hobbs 22470
Prices in euros from Amazon.de, as of 11 June 2026. Prices and availability may differ on Amazon.co.uk.
By Seydhan Cakmak · Editor-in-chief · Last checked: · AI-translated from the German original
Two different concepts for a crease-free outfit on the move: the Philips STH3020 is a foldable handheld steamer for hanging clothes, while the Russell Hobbs 22470 is a classic travel iron with dual voltage. We compare steam output, tank, weight, handling and price.
Editorial rating based on manufacturer specs and Amazon catalogue data. We do not trial products ourselves. How we rate
Who wins in which category?
| Category | Winner | Reasoning |
|---|---|---|
| Steam output | Philips STH3020 | 20 g/min constant vs 10 g variable for the Russell Hobbs, double the steam output |
| Water tank | Philips STH3020 | 120 ml vs 80 ml for the Russell Hobbs, lasts longer between refills |
| Handling without an ironing board | Philips STH3020 | smooths hanging clothes directly on the hanger; the Russell Hobbs needs a surface |
| Weight | Russell Hobbs 22470 | 0.69 kg documented; the Philips gives no weight, but is foldable and also suitable for travel |
| Worldwide use | Russell Hobbs 22470 | 110 to 240 V dual voltage without an adapter; not stated for the Philips |
| Price | Russell Hobbs 22470 | from €18.00 vs from €36.00 for the Philips |
Which one is right for you?
If you want to freshen shirts and dresses quickly on the hanger and need more steam with a larger tank → Philips STH3020. If you are looking for razor-sharp creases, worldwide voltage compatibility and the lowest price → Russell Hobbs 22470. The Philips is the steam specialist without an ironing board, the Russell Hobbs the light, cheap travel iron for classic ironing.
Philips STH3020 or Russell Hobbs 22470? Short answer.
Which is better: Philips STH3020 or Russell Hobbs 22470?
It depends on your priority. Steam output: Philips STH3020 (20 g/min constant vs 10 g variable for the Russell Hobbs, double the steam output); water tank: Philips STH3020 (120 ml vs 80 ml for the Russell Hobbs, lasts longer between refills); handling without an ironing board: Philips STH3020 (smooths hanging clothes directly on the hanger; the Russell Hobbs needs a surface). The verdict of this comparison explains which model suits which type of user.
How do the Philips STH3020/10 and the Russell 22470-56 differ?
The Philips STH3020/10 and the Russell 22470-56 differ mainly in these points: steam output (advantage Philips STH3020), water tank (advantage Philips STH3020), handling without an ironing board (advantage Philips STH3020), weight (advantage Russell Hobbs 22470), worldwide use (advantage Russell Hobbs 22470), price (advantage Russell Hobbs 22470).
More steam iron comparisons.
All steam irons compared
Complete table of all rated models with pros and cons, dimensions, price and recommendation per use case.
CategoryOpen the steam irons category
All subcategories, reviews and buying guides for steam irons.
Guide · 6 minMini appliance buying guide
How to read energy labels, consumption figures and dimensions correctly: the buying guide for singles.